Originally published: August 8, 2014
Last updated: August 8, 2014 - 7:23pm
[Commentary] The House Commerce Committee concludes another round of public commenting on its effort to update the Communications Act of 1934. The focus of this round was what role Congress and the Federal Communications Commission should play in the market for interconnection of networks.
Daniel Lyons and Gus Hurwitz joined scholars from the Free State Foundation in their comments, highlighting the importance of flexibility and responsiveness in interconnection markets. They argue that interconnection among IP networks is very different and more technical than the interconnection between ILECs that are governed by the 1996 Act.
In my submission, I provide two stories of deregulation from Denmark.
[Layton is a researcher at the University of Aalborg, Denmark]
- The #CommActUpdate is facilitating much needed improvement to spectrum policy
- A #CommActUpdate To Promote Innovation and Economic Growth
- Realizing the digital future means letting go of the past
- House Commerce Committee CommActUpdate Efforts Continue With Interconnection White Paper
- The double standard in regulation for managed services and OTT
- House Communications and Technology Subcommittee Hearing with FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler
- #CommActUpdate: Perspectives from Former FCC Chairmen
- FCC and Verizon: There is a technical solution
- #CommActUpdate: The IP interconnection model has been a huge success
- #CommActUpdate: Congress Should Focus on Competition, Consumer Choice
- House Commerce Committee Focuses on Competition Policy in Latest #CommActUpdate White Paper
- Netflix double standard: Free for me if everybody else pays
- Content delivery networks safe from net neutrality… for now
- Subcommittees to Explore How Advances in Communications and Technology Can Inform 21st Century Cure
- The Five Questions