At what point do campaign advertisements become counterproductive? As Pennsylvanians finally vote, Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama might have provided an answer. In one week alone, each candidate unveiled five different television ads. With spending estimated at $20 million state-wide, this battle of primary ads is expected to be one of the biggest ever. On an average day in the state's capital, Harrisburg, 228 television ads ran, according to Campaign Media Analysis Group, a research company owned by TNS Media Intelligence. The candidates ran ads on "Oprah" in the mornings, "Days of Our Lives" in the afternoon and "American Idol" in the evening. Each left a mark on "Without a Trace." There was little escape; 94% of registered Democrats had seen a TV ad for Sen. Obama, and 88% had seen an ad for Sen. Clinton.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120882873447033475.html?mod=todays_us_page_one
(requires subscription)
Links to Sources
Related
- Multimedia Killed the TV Star
- TiVo Serves Up Portrait of the Ad-Zappers
- Ad wars: Obama buys more, Clinton sets tempo
- Talking Back to the TV
- Pandora Tells Candidates It Can Help Locate Voters
- Google, Ally to Target TV Spots
- Big Loser in Pennsylvania Primary: Cable News Networks
- Court Puts Ad Limits on 'Hillary: The Movie'
- Sen Clinton's Media Stance
- TV Networks Gain In 'Upfront' Ad Deals
- Obama’s Unusual Primetime Exposure
- Political Ads Inundate Media Markets
- Bill Clinton 'Woefully Unprepared for 21st Century Media'
- Clinton, Obama, Edwards to Skip Fox-Sponsored Debate
- Political Ads Edge Out Consumer Ads
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

