Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 12:17am
[SOURCE: Miami Herald, AUTHOR: Edward Wasserman edward_wasserman@hotmail.com]
[Commentary] Beneath the glare of high-stakes political corruption, the unfolding scandal of former lobbyist and current felon Jack Abramoff has a media angle too, which involves his low-light stable of secretly paid commentators. Media coverage, predictably, has focused almost exclusively on the writers who accepted Abramoff's money. But what about the newspapers that accepted their work? Do editors really believe that the $200 they pay for that sophisticated column defending the health-insurance industry actually covers the cost of the work the column required? Of course not. But it's, ''Don't ask, don't tell.'' They say nothing, because their work depends on this payola. But even with disclosure, the picture will be murky. If mainstream journalism and commentary become the work of professional wordsmiths who are perpetually on the hustle, the challenge to ethical journalism will be severe. The future of a practice that's dedicated, however imperfectly, to truth-seeking in the public interest and that tries to stay free of undisclosed personal entanglements and conflicts will be far from sure.
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/opinion/13581275.htm
Links to Sources
Related
- Internet Companies Concentrating Power
- Can journalism live without ads?
- Journalism becoming a consumer product
- All the propaganda that's fit to print
- Meet the new boss . . . a lot like the old boss
- Why ignoring our northern neighbor matters
- U.S. Paid Many Journalists
- Curtain rises on Televisa-Univision trial
- FCC can't turn back media tide
- Companies lobby newest FCC members on network neutrality rule
- Keep Internet free, fast
- Keeping access open to all
- GOP memo against Web gambling invokes Abramoff scandal
- Google's Schmidt to testify before Senate panel
- Lobby scandal tars competitive media
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

