Originally published: January 12, 2012
Last updated: January 12, 2012 - 9:57pm
[Commentary] Journalists are big believers in the First Amendment; its legal force undergirds the fearless journalism that democracy requires. But now comes a perversion of that amendment, an effort to turn it against another tool that enables democracy-sustaining journalism: the laws that require political donors to make their names known, and that empower vital reporting on money, power, and influence.
Of course, our right to know who funds our politicians or pays for any given civic megaphone has been battered time and again by lawyers and loopholes. Unprecedented amounts of unprecedentedly opaque money will shape the 2012 elections. Reporters already have their work cut out for them to make this understandable and to show who is trying to gain influence and shape public opinion. Imagine how much harder this job would be if disclosure requirements were found to be an unconstitutional burden on free speech?
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Two Democrats' remedy for the high court's campaign finance ruling
- The Media and the First Amendment
- Behind the attack ads
- FCC Reform Amendment Would Require Online Political Files
- Other People's Politics
- Crowdfunding Journalism
- Passing the Disclose Act would shed some light on stealth campaign spending
- Real Disclosure for Real Democracy
- The First Amendment, Upside Down
- Google Chairman Pledges to Stand With Journalists, Increase Transparency
- Carl Paladino's Journalist-Ban, First Amendment Problem
- WAMU news director claims ‘firewall’ transgression
- Keeping Politics in the Shadows
- A Shield for the Public
- It's time for journalists to stand up against Fox News
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

