[Commentary] The United States owes a federal shield law not only to American journalists but to journalists around the world. Passage of such a law is urgently needed. By finally allowing the media to protect the anonymity of confidential sources, Congress would do more than close a fissure in U.S. press freedoms: It would also help curtail the destructive behavior that current U.S. prosecutorial habits are inspiring globally. The proposed U.S. federal shield law is officially called the Free Flow of Information Act, in reference to the renowned commitments of the Helsinki Accords more than 30 years ago -- human rights promises that still invigorate today's Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). Passing the Free Flow of Information Act would send a clear message that prosecuting journalists is not in vogue anymore and would signal solidarity with nations that crave more press freedom.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/03/AR2008060303158.html
(requires registration)
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Media Shield Measure Stalls in Senate
- Journalists need a federal shield law
- A bill to protect journalists' sources gets better
- Conyers Backs Journalists, Slams Media
- Chill the Press
- Approve the shield law
- A balanced 'shield law'
- Media Groups Unite on Protecting Sources
- Support democracy in Hungary with new Radio Free Europe broadcasts
- Congressional Leaders Propose Reporter Shield Law
- After Afghan War Leaks, Revisions in a Shield Bill
- House passes measure to protect reporters
- White House, Senate Strike Balance on Reporter Protections
- Senate Bill Aims to Define Who Is a Journalist
- White House Toughens Its Stance on Journalist Shield Law
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

