Last updated: June 16, 2008 - 7:47am
Children's-advocacy groups, including the Benton Foundation, weighed in on the Federal Communications Commission's Supreme Court appeal of its indecency finding against swearing on Fox's Billboard Music Awards, saying that too broad a decision could hurt kids. According to a copy of the brief filed with the court, the groups -- which included the United Church of Christ, the PTA and the American Academy of Pediatrics -- said they are not asking the Supremes to decide one way or the other so long as they do not weaken the FCC's regulatory authority over content in the process. Gambling that the justices will take its side, the Parents Television Council asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on the constitutionality of the Federal Communications Commission's indecency-enforcement regime.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6569306.html?rssid=193
* PTC Enters FCC Indecency Fray at High Court
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6569248.html?rssid=193
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Supreme Court Extends Deadline for Indecency Responses
- FCC Defends Cussing Crackdown
- NRB Amicus Brief Supports FCC On Indecency
- ABC Affiliates Weigh In at Supreme Court
- Minow, Fowler: Strip FCC of Indecency-Enforcement Authority
- Networks Go After Red Lion, Pacifica
- The FCC Makes Its Indecency Case at the Supreme Court, But Has the Court Already Shown Its Cards?
- News Corp: FCC Needs To Stop Regulating Speech
- Fox Gets Extension From Supremes On Profane Response
- Webs gearing for Supreme showdown with the FCC
- Court Says Profanity Arguments Can Be Televised
- FCC Defends "Fleeting Expletives" Fox Ruling
- CBS v. FCC On Indecency Enforcement
- Third Circuit Denies Full-Court Review Of Fox Decision
- FCC Shouldn't Judge Indecency
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

