Submitted: March 5, 2012 - 5:26pm
Originally published: March 5, 2012
Last updated: March 5, 2012 - 5:33pm
Originally published: March 5, 2012
Last updated: March 5, 2012 - 5:33pm
Source:
AdAge
Author:
Dave Morgan
Television advertising has a growing reach problem caused by accelerating audience fragmentation.
Over the past fifteen years, the average reach of national TV campaigns has dropped by 20% and individual spots by 80%, in spite of TV viewing being at an all-time high. While this seems to have come as a surprise to many, what surprised me was the number of industry folks who have responded with an indifferent "So what?" Apparently, there is a not-so-insignificant school of thought in the media industry that reach on TV doesn't matter so much anymore. I disagree. Ad reach on TV matters now more than ever. Agencies, clients and networks alike should all care.
Here are five good reasons why:
- A target audience not reached is a potential customer not created.
- The cause of the reach problem is fragmentation compounded by the failure of industry's tools and practices to keep up.
- Talking targeting is a red herring.
- The "network effect" still requires audience exposure.
- Making up lost reach "off-TV" is expensive and not even close to comparable.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- TV Viewing Hits Record High
- Alternate-Delivery Hits All-Time High; Cable Falls to 18-Year Low
- Broadcast News Coverage of 2008 Super Bowl Ads Reaches More Than 750 Million Viewers
- Will TV Ever Have a 1978 World Series Again?
- Campaigns Turning More to Online Videos
- Silicon Valley readies for privacy battle
- TV ad campaigns fail to reach audiences
- A Broadcasting Turnoff
- Cable penetration hits 21-Year Low
- How Neuromarketers Tapped the Vote Button in Your Brain to Help the GOP Win the House
- A Question of Diversity
- Political online spending hits new heights
- Senator Warner on Net Neutrality
- TV Broadcasters & Their Political Files
- Keynote Susan Crawford at TNW2012
Ratings
Recommendation:
1
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

