Submitted: March 8, 2012 - 9:27am
Last updated: March 8, 2012 - 9:30am
Last updated: March 8, 2012 - 9:30am
Source:
New York Times
Author:
Daniel Wakin
Plagiarism? Excessive borrowing? The normal creative process? Suggestions that Osvaldo Golijov, one of today’s most sought-after composers, improperly incorporated the work of another composer have stirred up a squall in classical music circles. Critics have weighed in on the subject, prompting a discussion of what exactly is this strange thing called the creative process and whether audiences know exactly what they are getting when an orchestra puts a new piece on the program.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Hyperlocal sites becoming major M&A targets
- Pandora Media Sues ASCAP Seeking Lower Songwriter Fees
- So Many Apologies, So Much Data Mining
- Federal judge sets formula for Internet music royalties
- ASCAP Strikes Sour Chord With Consumer Advocates
- Facebook's breastfeeding ban
- After ballyhooed debut, some schools see problems with iPad
- YouTube loses court battle over music clips
- Authors, composers want 3.4% of every Belgian’s Internet bill
- Clear Channel/Big Machine Deal Is Step In Right Direction, But Not Far Enough
- Key News Audiences Now Blend Online and Traditional Sources
- India 3G Price Hits $976 million
- Top bids $2.78 bln as US wireless auction opens
- 11th Annual Future of Music Policy Summit
- Judge Allows Sprint Challenge to AT&T Deal Over Access to Devices
Topics
Ratings
Recommendation:
1
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

