Last updated: April 19, 2012 - 1:27pm
The most active senders and receivers of texts are nonwhite, earn incomes below $30,000, and do not have a high school education, says a 2011 study conducted by the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. AT&T, to use but one example, charged $1,310 per megabyte to send text messages in 2008. In 2011, the company effectively doubled that amount. And that's assuming you're even on a monthly plan. Most low-income users are almost certainly on prepaid devices, where fees for text messages are even higher. Yet it costs the carrier virtually nothing to handle text messages. This raises an obvious question. Are text messages a regressive tax on the poor that helps subsidize cell service for the rest of us?
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Screen Time Higher Than Ever for Children
- The Social Cost of Wireless Taxation: Wireless Taxation and its Consequences for Minorities and the Poor
- T-Mobile, Cleartalk Get Go-Ahead on Low-Income Services
- Lack of computer access a major hurdle for the poor
- For the poor, cellphones can offer lifeline
- Is Obamaphone good for the poor? Maybe not.
- Keeping Low-Income Consumers in Mind While Reviewing the Verizon Spectrum Buy
- Lifeline phone service goes wireless
- From the Benton Blog: FCC’s Low-Income Phone Reform Needs to Connect and Tie Eligibility to People, Not Housing
- Brazil government to inject BRL 13 bln into broadband plan
- Lower-Income Viewing Offers Distinct Ad Opportunities
- The Best 10 Ironies About The “Obama Phone”
- Public Computing Broadband Grant Criteria
- The Best (and Worst) of Mobile Connectivity
- Keeping Low-Income Consumers in Mind While Reviewing the Verizon Spectrum Buy
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

