Originally published: May 6, 2012
Last updated: May 6, 2012 - 12:25pm
The copyright phase of the Oracle v. Google trial is winding down. While the world waits for a jury verdict on the facts, the judge overseeing the case is wrestling with the complexities of the law.
Oracle has argued that the "structure, sequence and organization" of the Java API is eligible for copyright protection, while Google disagrees. Judge William Alsup asked each party to submit a 20-page brief answering a series of 13 in-depth questions about the Java API and the relevant precedents. Among other things, he asked the parties to weigh in on the implications of this week's EU court decision that allowing functional characteristics of programming languages to be copyrighted would "monopolize" ideas. Some of Judge Alsup's comments in the courtroom in recent days suggested that he is skeptical of Oracle's position.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Oracle v. Google patent phase wraps up
- Jury: Google did not infringe Oracle patents with Android
- Oracle loses bid for ruling Google use of IP wasn't fair use
- Google infringed on Oracle copyrights, jury finds, but leaves key question unanswered
- Google wins crucial API ruling, Oracle's case decimated
- Google proposes Android revenue for Oracle
- Larry Page evasive with Oracle's lawyer, but admits Google never obtained Java license
- What the final decision on Oracle v. Google really means
- Google tries to destroy Oracle's case, asks for judgment on Java copyrights
- Judge orders Oracle, Google to disclose paid journalists and bloggers
- Judge says Google's Android lost money in 2010
- The E-Mail That Google Really Doesn't Want A Jury To See
- Why Oracle vs. Google Matters to You
- Judge tosses Oracle's $6.1 billion damage estimate in claim against Google
- Google, Oracle attorneys wrap up first part of trial
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

