Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 12:37am
[SOURCE: The Minnesota Daily, AUTHOR: Becca Vargo Daggett, Municipal Telecommunications Project]
[Commentary] Students, small companies and struggling startups will be hurt if telephone and cable companies start charging content providers. But the solution is not to ask Congress to impose regulations enforcing network neutrality. The solution is to build publicly owned, open access networks as an alternative to the private, proprietary networks on which we currently rely. A publicly owned broadband network would not be a monopoly. Customers could still choose to continue to use the incumbent phone or cable company’s pipes, but they would have that choice. The smart money is on people gravitating toward publicly owned pipes, which allow them to choose how they use the Internet. This is why the incumbent phone and cable companies oppose municipal broadband. Cities have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to create a competitive local market for broadband by building publicly owned networks. They should not waste it.
http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2006/02/02/66942
Links to Sources
Related
- An alternative to San Francisco's Wi-Fi deal
- Is Publicly Owned Information Infrastructure A Good Investment for San Francisco?
- Is There "Enough" Broadband Competition? And How High Is Up?
- 12 in Congress Likely to Forge Telecom Bill in Secret
- Roberts, Martin Meet on Adelphia
- Why Is Mighty Time Warner So Scared of Tiny Salisbury, NC?
- Politicos push to update Cold War-era alert system
- Two Telecom Mergers, One Digital Divide
- Verizon’s Captain Charts Slow, Steady Course
- Public ownership of broadband access is best
- Muni Broadband Said to Sell Risks Short; Private Incentives Better
- Cheap Wireless Network Pays Off for Asheville
- The Unspoken Tension Between Public and Private Broadband
- Groups Respond to New Telecommunications Bill
- FCC faces steep challenge in developing national broadband policy
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

