Television news organizations, facing unprecedented scrutiny, have often expressed contrition for poorly chosen words during this election season. In a campaign that includes the first viable African-American presidential candidate, the lines of appropriate speech have become fuzzy. News organizations are under pressure from a broad network of self-appointed watchdogs, including organized groups like Media Matters and individuals. These watchdogs are likely to remain vigilant about gaffes, misstatements and potentially biased language through the November vote. Just this week, Gina McCauley, a well-known blogger in Austin, Texas, started michelleobamawatch.com to track the portrayal of Mrs. Obama in the news media. In this campaign cycle, television news organizations have issued at least 10 apologies in total over on-air expressions.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121332164069470457.html?mod=todays_us_page_one
(requires subscription)
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Google’s Spreading Tentacles of Influence
- Black TV Is Wearing Its Politics on Its Sleeve
- Obama Wins, but Clinton Drives the narrative
- No Smooth Ride on TV Networks' Road to Diversity
- How the NAACP is Promoting Broadband Adoption
- Some Final Thoughts on Campaign '08
- CBC wants African-American as Commerce secretary
- Study: Oprah-Generated Buzz Helping Obama
- Loud and Clear, an Outlet for Churches, Immigrants
- Political Ad Funders Must Not Dodge Scrutiny
- Press Takes a Harder Look at Obama -- and Itself
- People Still Seek News From TV
- Sarah Palin drove the media narrative last week
- Facing Antitrust Scrutiny, Google Execs Still Backing Obama
- Internet access shouldn't be limited by income
Topics
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

