Last updated: October 11, 2012 - 8:45am
Sesame Street's objection to the use of Big Bird as a political prop has churned plenty of headlines over the last week, but it's hardly the first time this year a prominent name has protested an unwitting campaign appearance.
From Exxon to AARP to several national journalists, a growing number of well-known groups and individuals have taken exception when either President Obama or GOP nominee Mitt Romney invoked them – without notice or approval – to hammer home a political message. While those organizations have plenty to gain from the national attention a campaign-trail shout-out can generate, they seem more wary that appearances of supporting one side or the other could alienate a huge segment of the country, potentially costing them customers, members or even influence on Capitol Hill.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- “I’m Sorry Jim”
- “I’m Sorry Jim”
- Sesame Street asks Obama campaign to take down attack ad featuring Big Bird
- Presidential debate 101: How much would US save by cutting off Big Bird?
- The Fight Over PBS Should Be to Broaden Its Scope, Not to Threaten It
- National Journal Bars Quotations Tweaked by Sources
- APTS, Rep. Blumenthal Take Up for Big Bird
- What the NPR fight is really about
- Democratic governors file complaint on Fox
- Romney doubles-down on Big Bird
- Romney’s Pledge Puts Focus on Public TV
- How Large and Long-Lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads?
- Occupy Wall Street Fuels Economic Coverage
- Romney heads for California to fill coffers
- 2012: The mobile web election
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

