Originally published: December 6, 2012
Last updated: December 6, 2012 - 10:30pm
Minority advocates have told the Federal Communications Commission that, despite reports to the contrary, they do not support loosening the newspaper-broadcast crossownership rule (NBCO) without evidence it will not negatively impact diversity.
In a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, the National Urban League (NUL), National Council of La Raza (NCLR), Asian American Justice Center (AAJC) and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) said they were writing to clarify their position. While in a filing to the FCC on media ownership the groups did say they would not object to relaxing the rule, they wrote this week, they only did so with the explicit caveat that "if such a relaxation would not diminish minority ownership." They say any implication that their support does not require that evidence, which they say the FCC has not provided, is not correct.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- They Want to do What Now? The FCC’s Media Ownership Proposal
- Georgetown Partners Takes Sirius/XM to Task in FCC Filing
- Diversity still an issue at TV networks
- Coalition Asks FCC to Focus on Diversity in Quadrennial Ownership Rule Review
- NABOB: FCC Should Delay Ownership Vote
- FCC Media Ownership Changes
- House Judiciary Committee Postpones Media-Ownership and Diversity Hearing
- Free Press Opposes FCC Proposal to Relax Ownership Rules
- Public Interest Groups Request Reversal of Rules That Encourage Media Cross-Ownership
- Civil Rights Groups Call for FCC Action on Diversity Studies
- Does Bigger Media Equal Better Media?
- FCC Grants Applications for Transfer of Control of Tribune Company
- Media Ownership Puts Martin on Hill Hot Seat
- Free Press Not Assuaged By MMTC Study Proposal
- NAACP Opposes Effort to Change Online Royalties
Topics
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

