Originally published: January 6, 2013
Last updated: January 9, 2013 - 3:10am
There are three things that matter in consumer data collection: location, location, location. E-ZPasses clock the routes we drive. Metro passes register the subway stations we enter. ATM’s record where and when we get cash. Not to mention the credit and debit card transactions that map our trajectories in comprehensive detail — the stores, restaurants and gas stations we frequent; the hotels and health clubs we patronize. Each of these represents a kind of knowing trade, a conscious consumer submission to surveillance for the sake of convenience. But now legislators, regulators, advocacy groups and marketers are squaring off over newer technology: smartphones and mobile apps that can continuously record and share people’s precise movements. At issue is whether consumers are unwittingly acquiescing to pervasive tracking just for the sake of having mobile amenities like calendar, game or weather apps.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- GE Doesn’t Stall Way to Find Callers Opposed by E-ZPass
- A Casualty of the Technology Revolution: 'Locational Privacy'
- Ruling Spurs Debate on Digital Tracking
- Growing Presence in the Courtroom: Cellphone Data as Witness
- Rep Markey Still Concerned About Apple Tracking
- Advertisers Get a Trove of Clues in Smartphones
- Big Brother Lurking in WiFi, Mobile Services
- Technology Aside, Most People Still Decline to Be Located
- 911 tech pinpoints people in buildings—but could disrupt wireless ISPs
- ACLU urges wireless carriers to stop tracking customers' location
- US Is Tightening Web Privacy Rule to Shield Young
- When the Privacy Button Is Already Pressed
- TPRC Panelists Consider Location-Based Privacy and P2P Arms Race
- Wrapping Up the Apple Location Brouhaha
- Smartphone Trackers Raise Privacy Worries
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

