Last updated: January 11, 2013 - 8:53am
The conversion to electronic health records has failed so far to produce the hoped-for savings in health care costs and has had mixed results, at best, in improving efficiency and patient care, according to a new analysis by the influential RAND Corporation.
Optimistic predictions by RAND in 2005 helped drive explosive growth in the electronic records industry and encouraged the federal government to give billions of dollars in financial incentives to hospitals and doctors that put the systems in place. Officials at RAND said their new analysis did not try to put a dollar figure on how much electronic record-keeping had helped or hurt efforts to reduce costs. But the firm’s acknowledgment that its earlier analysis was overly optimistic adds to a chorus of concern about the cost of the new systems and the haste with which they have been adopted.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Growing Pains As Doctors' Offices Adopt Electronic Records
- Digital Records May Not Cut Health Costs, Study Cautions
- Medicare Bills Rise as Records Turn Electronic
- Medicare Is Faulted on Shift to Electronic Records
- Electronic Health Record use improves preventive-care quality
- Little Benefit Seen, So Far, in Electronic Patient Records
- No hospital savings with electronic records
- Obama's $80 Billion Exaggeration
- Study places EHRs at core of saving cardiac patients' lives
- Mining Electronic Records for Revealing Health Data
- IT helps with care coordination in heart disease prevention program
- GAO Finds EHRs promote better care
- Electronic records no panacea for health care industry
- Obama Continues To Tout Health IT as a Key to Health Reform
- Doctors question benefits of electronic records
National Broadband Plan
Learn more about:
Location
Legislation
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

