Originally published: January 18, 2013
Last updated: January 23, 2013 - 2:27am
Verizon's argument that network neutrality rules infringe its free speech rights is "at odds with common sense," four former Federal Communications Commission members argue in a new court filing.
"Verizon’s arguments fail as a matter of constitutional principle," they argue. "There is nothing inherently expressive about transmitting others’ data packets, at a subscriber’s direction, over the Internet." The coalition adds that Verizon's free-speech argument has wide-ranging repercussions that could affect a host of regulations. "Were Verizon’s theories credited, Congress’s historic power to take and authorize measures to preserve openness of communication networks would be unsettled and dramatically narrowed," they say in a friend-of-the-court brief. The brief was filed on behalf of a group that includes four former FCC commissioners -- Reed Hundt, Michael Copps, Tyrone Brown and Nicholas Johnson.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Digital Rights Group Slams Verizon's Anti-Neutrality Argument
- FCC: Supreme Court ruling bolsters net neutrality defense
- Democrats troubled by Verizon's free speech argument in network neutrality case
- Reaction to Verizon's Network Neutrality Legal Challenge
- FCC Seeks Dismissal Of Verizon Net Neutrality Lawsuit
- FCC's McDowell: Congress won't back off network neutrality due to Verizon appeal
- Verizon Appeals FCC Net Neutrality Suit
- Verizon attack on Internet misguided
- Verizon: Free Speech at Heart of Network Neutrality Case
- Verizon: Court Decision Forecloses FCC Speech Argument
- Consumers Union Takes FCC’s Side vs. Verizon
- We Need a Network Neutrality Rulemaking Not A Backroom Deal
- DC Court Offers Verizon Best Shot At Overturning Network Neutrality Rules
- Verizon Playing Dangerous Game in Network Neutrality Battle
- Genachowski gets 'Dingell-gram' on Broadband Reclassification
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

