Originally published: January 27, 2013
Last updated: February 14, 2013 - 4:57pm
“Forty years ago, a hacker was someone who took great joy in knowing everything about computers,” said Susan P. Crawford, a professor at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University. “The word was really used in admiration. Now it is used to describe and condemn both professional cyberattackers and amateurs who are swept together within the broad description of the word.”
The cases of Daniel Spitler and Aaron Swartz are examples of the justice system’s misunderstanding of what a hacker actually is. To many people who understand computers and the law, there is a danger in lumping people who have not sought financial gain with armed robbers. Where people should receive slaps on the wrist, they face decades in prison.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Hacker behind AT&T iPad breach pleads guilty
- Edward de Grazia, Lawyer Who Fought Censorship of Books, Is Dead at 86
- Comcast Spends Big in Pressing for Merger
- Hackers Declare War on Government Agencies
- Misunderstanding Race and the Digital Divide
- Dissolution of Hacker Group Might Not End Attacks
- The Obama administration's attacks on the media
- Hackers Select a New Target: Other Hackers
- Hackers With Enigmatic Motives Vex Companies
- New York Attorney General Subpoenas Sony
- Telecom’s Big Players Hold Back the Future
- Google hackers duped system administrators to penetrate networks, experts say
- Chinese hackers suspected in attack on The Post’s computers
- For Some Hackers, Goal Is Pranks
- Chinese Hackers Targeted Wall Street Journal Computers
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

