Originally published: February 14, 2013
Last updated: February 15, 2013 - 2:43pm
The Federal Communications Commission filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia arguing the Commission was justified last fall in sunsetting the requirement that hybrid (digital/analog) cable systems provide must-carry station signals in analog format (the viewability rule, as broadcasters see it; the "dual-carriage" mandate, as cable operators view it).
The National Association of Broadcasters and others filed suit against the ruling, asking that it be overturned and the mandate restored. In its filing, the FCC argues that its decision was consistent with statute and its discretion to interpret that statute, that its interpretation was reasonable and that it gave adequate notice that it was considering a device-based approach (cable operators must make boxes that convert digital signals to analog available at low or no cost).
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- FCC Proposing To Sunset Dual-Carriage Viewability Rule
- Cable Nets Attack Dual Must Carry
- FCC Denies Stay of Viewability/Dual Carriage Order
- Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down on FCC DTV Plan
- NCTA: Time to Ditch Dual Carriage
- NCTA Opposed to Dual Carriage
- Stations Pin Viewability Hope on FCC Commissioner Clyburn
- NAB Supports Extending Cable Carriage Mandate
- ACA Says HD Exemption Is Still Needed
- FCC Tees Up Dual-Carriage Plan
- Old Court Defeat Could Help Cable Now
- Activists Call For DTV Obligations Before Dual Carriage
- Cable Networks Sue FCC Over Dual Carriage
- Multicast Must-Carry Vote 6/15
- Group Lobbying Congress To Step Into FCC Viewability Decision
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

