Originally published: March 15, 2013
Last updated: March 15, 2013 - 6:43pm
Judge Susan Illston, of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, struck down a controversial set of laws allowing the Federal Bureau of Investigation to seek people's data without a court's approval, saying the strict secrecy orders demanded by the laws are not constitutional.
Judge Illston said the laws, which underlie a tool known as a "national security letter," violate the First Amendment and the separation of powers principles. In her order, Judge Illston ordered the government to stop issuing national security letters or enforcing their gag orders, although she said enforcement of her judgment would be stayed pending appeal. A Department of Justice spokesman said the department was "reviewing the order." If the department does not appeal, the judge's orders will go into effect after 90 days.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Judge Issues Restraining Order in Bay Area Newspaper Sale
- Feds Shift Tracking Defense
- Consumer Watchdog Seeks To Weigh In On Google's Privacy Settlement
- Federal judge throws out parts of Patriot Act
- Today's Quote 04.12.07
- MediaPost Seeks To Unseal Google's Report In Bungled Email Case
- US Firm Acknowledges Syria Uses Its Gear to Block Web
- 'Stingray' Phone Tracker Fuels Constitutional Clash
- Judge Approves FTC’s $22.5 Million Fine of Google
- Covert FBI Power to Obtain Phone Data Faces Rare Test
- Judge: I'm Not Inclined To Block McClatchy's Bay Area Deal
- 'Cookies' Cause Bitter Backlash
- Judge Calls for Data on Telecom Lobby
- Advocacy Group Urges Court To Reject Google's 'Miniscule' $22.5M Privacy Settlement
- Judge permits trial over newspaper deals
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

