Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 12:57am
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: Richard Holober, Consumer Federation of California]
[Commentary] As cell phones become more popular, consumer complaints have soared. One means of mitigating those grievances: the California Public Utilities Commission, which is supposed to protect the consumer. So far, however, the commission has fiddled while phone users burn with anger and frustration. Next month, the spotlight will be on the PUC as it considers enacting modest rules to curb the worst cell-phone industry practices. The Consumer Federation recommends a proposal from PUC Commissioner Dian Grueneich which grants consumers some real relief from the worst phone company abuses. The alternative restores the right to revoke new phone service for 30 days without penalty or early termination fees. It stops phone companies from changing the terms of a contract without the customer's consent. And it adds an important new protection for non-English speaking customers. It would require phone contracts to be written in the same language the company uses to market the product -- saving vulnerable consumers from bait-and-switch tactics.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/02/23/EDG2PHCEC91.DTL
Related
- California Assembly OKs Limiting Drivers' Cell Phone Use
- Cell phone customers still miffed over dropped calls
- More Americans go for cell phones, drop landlines
- Cell phone firms remain among most unpopular
- The Fight Over Your TV Set
- The world's a cell-phone stage
- Phone problems? Go online
- WHO report questions cell phone risks
- FEC clears way for cell phone sales to go to candidates
- CA: Keep your hands off the cell phone come July
- Give consumers voice on cell phone radiation
- Wireless industry says 'bill shock' rules are unnecessary
- Telecom bill of rights revived
- Users' complaints to FTC show another side of Google
- Rules change lets AT&T avoid disclosure requirements
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

