Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 12:59am
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Robert Corn-Revere]
[Commentary] The FCC's “Further Report†on cable à la carte pricing should be seen for what it is: a piece of advocacy, not reasoned policymaking. This complete reversal of the FCC's position within one year of the agency's original report to Congress is unprecedented. It ignores prior studies of the issue, including those by the Government Accountability Office, and it seriously misstates the record the FCC has previously assembled. The report's lack of substance likely doesn't matter, since it may already have served its purpose. Announcing the redo helped FCC Chairman Kevin Martin pressure major operators into creating family-programming tiers. The report also led the usual array of pro-regulation advocates to crow about the reversal and to demand a legislative response. Serious policymakers should demand more: a real study instead of a stratagem.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6311002?display=Opinion&referral=SUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
Related
- Viacom: Study Advises Against a la Carte
- Corn-Revere Warns FCC About Broadband Reclassification
- CBS warns of censorship if bare breast edict stays
- The Premium Advantage
- Minority Groups Oppose A La Carte
- Tate Pushes Cable on À La Carte
- Booz Allen Defends Study
- PTC, CWA: Family Tier Is Insufficient
- Unfair and Indecent? Broadcast Regulation in the Courts and Congress at the Start of the Obama Administration
- Family Tiering Gets Technical
- It's Wait and See for NRB on Tiering
- Wyden Wants More From Cable
- Martin Asked To Re-Examine Retrans
- Martin Touts Cable A La Carte, Regulation
- Congress and the FCC Turn Up the Heat
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

