Submitted: July 25, 2008 - 7:59am
Last updated: July 25, 2008 - 7:59am
Last updated: July 25, 2008 - 7:59am
Source:
Los Angeles Times
Author:
Editorial staff
[Commentary] There should be some deterrent against copyright holders attacking fair uses online, deliberately or otherwise. At the very least, they should have to look at potentially infringing uses of their works and consider fair-use law before sending take-down notices. The courts may be the ultimate arbiter of individual fair-use claims, but copyright holders shouldn't be free to ignore the guidance provided by federal statutes and previous court rulings. Besides, taking down baby videos won't make Universal or Prince any richer in the long run. They'd be better off working with YouTube to capitalize on fans' enthusiasm than scrubbing the site clean of his hits.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- A Digital Copyright Demo Turns Into a Fair-Use Volley
- CDT: Meritless Take-Down Notices Could Chill Online Free Speech
- Standing Up To Takedown Notices
- Twitter to flag tweets accused of violating copyrights
- Online piracy: As a mere host, YouTube is protected from liability
- New Zealand judge: FBI must release more evidence to Kim Dotcom
- YouTube Declares Victory In Viacom Case
- YouTube Responds To McCain Copyright Complaint
- NBCU, Public Knowledge Spar over ISP Filtering
- Google-itis: Beware of Class Action Settlements
- Should we trust Google when it comes to piracy and search?
- Fair-Use Fans Try to Bolster Copyright-Warning Challenge
- Hello, Steve Brill, Get Me Rewrite
- Supporters, Detractors Weigh In On FCC's Network Neutrality Principles
- Viacom sued over Colbert parody on YouTube
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

