Submitted: March 1, 2006 - 10:37am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 1:02am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 1:02am
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Frazier Moore]
[Commentary] For cable subscribers, "a la carte" sounds appetizing: Pay only for the channels you want. Spare your family from networks you never watch and don't want your kids exposed to. And save money in the process. But what if you like the current pricing system? You subscribe to a tier of cable or satellite service, then get a bundle of channels. The more you pay, the wider the selection of channels. Also viewers may indeed watch only 17 channels. But over time, those 17 could vary. Viewers' tastes change and what they choose to watch can reflect that, if the options are there.
http://www.startribune.com/154/story/276827.html
Links to Sources
Related
- Decency Is Overrated
- Cable Customers' Choices Being Debated
- Why FCC Head Aims to Broaden Access to Spare Cable Channels
- A Grown-Up Kid Makes Some TV Requests
- FCC's Martin still takes no action on bundling
- Why Can't I Have Just the Cable Channels I Want?
- Martin Pitches Advertisers
- An FCC watcher's guide to Super Tuesday
- Reaction to FCC A La Carte Report
- FCC May Endorse Cable à la Carte, In a Policy Shift
- Congress and the FCC Turn Up the Heat
- Multiple-Choice Cable Content Bill Planned
- Local cable and all its services are threatened
- Karmazin Back on Hill to Sell Sat Radio Merger
- A la Carte Cable Could be a Tough Sell
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

