Last updated: August 18, 2008 - 8:03pm
[Commentary] Lately, the race for the White House has been an eruption of hard-hitting negative ads. If the current rate of attack ads continues, this election will have more than 100 uninterrupted days of negative ads with a potential cost of more than $350 million (and that is just from the candidates). By running these attack ads Sen Barack Obama (D-IL) could be treading on thin ice. His brand has been built on the idea of being a different kind of politician. Yet, time and time again we are reminded of the lessons learned in the 2004 "swift boat" debacle. The Obama campaign is in a tough spot. It must evaluate the potential cost to its brand of participating in a negative ad war vs. the damage of unanswered attacks. At this point, Sen John McCain has nothing to lose by going negative. However, he will likely need to come up with a second act.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Obama's Ads in Key States Go on Attack
- Obama ads overwhelm TV presence of McCain
- Politicians Grow Wary Of Survey as Internet Spreads Attack Ads
- Obama Takes Star Turn in Republican Ads
- The onslaught is coming to a TV near you
- Election Year Rains Millions on Media Outlets
- After Slow Start, Republicans Blanket Iowa With Ads
- Spending Big On Local Attack Ads
- Legal Controversy Erupts Over Political TV Ads
- GOP Strategists Say McCain Using Right Tactic, Wrong Ads
- McCain, Obama Ads Run in Network News
- NH Is Already Flooded With Attack Ads
- FCC Endorses Junk News, Calls Fox's TMZ and 700 Club 'Bona fide Newscasts'
- Over $45 Million Spent on Broadcast in Iowa
- Ad wars: Obama buys more, Clinton sets tempo
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

