Last updated: September 12, 2008 - 8:48am
The government must obtain a warrant based on probable cause of criminal activity before directing a wireless provider to turn over records that show where customers used their cellphones, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, in the first opinion by a federal district court on the issue. Judge Terrence F. McVerry of the Western District of Pennsylvania rejected the government's argument that historical cellphone tower location data did not require probable cause. The ruling could begin to establish the standard for such requests, which industry lawyers say are routine as more people carry cellphones that reveal their locations. Around the country, magistrate judges, who handle matters such as search warrants, have expressed concern about the lack of guidance.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Court OKs Warrantless Cell-Site Tracking
- Feds Say Mobile-Phone Location Data Not ‘Constitutionally Protected’
- Appeals court okays warrantless tracking
- Judge Declares Law Governing Warrantless Cellphone Tracking Unconstitutional
- Courts Divided Over Searches of Cellphones
- Justice Department appeals court ban on cell phone tracking
- Freedom of the Press and Criminal Solicitation
- Judges Weigh Phone Tracking
- Justice Department Expands Hunt for Data on Cellphones
- New law bans warrantless cell phone searches
- The secret life of your cellphone
- Cops, ACLU clash over GOP bill that would limit cellphone tracking
- San Mateo District Attorney Withdraws Controversial Gizmodo iPhone Warrant
- Feds Shift Tracking Defense
- Court Case Asks if ‘Big Brother’ Is Spelled GPS
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

