Despite attacks on media by McCain campaign, disparate coverage in McCain's favor
Last updated: September 23, 2008 - 9:47am
The media have for months reported complaints by the McCain campaign that they have favored his opponent in their coverage of the presidential race, while making little attempt to assess the accuracy of those complaints or to confirm or refute them. But in a review of the media's coverage of two stories negatively affecting or reflecting on Sen. Barack Obama and two stories negatively affecting or reflecting on Sen. John McCain -- specifically Obama's ties to Bill Ayers and Antoin Rezko, and McCain's dealings with donors whom he reportedly benefited and his association with G. Gordon Liddy -- Media Matters found that the five major newspapers and the three evening network news broadcasts have frequently mentioned Obama's ties to Ayers and Rezko, but have rarely mentioned McCain's dealings with donors and have ignored his association with Liddy.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- GOP Strategists Say McCain Using Right Tactic, Wrong Ads
- Report on Ayers Sped Up McCain Attack on Obama
- Dubious Claims in Obama's Ads Against McCain, Despite Vow of Truth
- Obama Fatigue - 48% Hearing Too Much About Him
- McCain's 'Litigator' of Media Wrongs
- McCain-Palin Love-Hate Media
- Verizon and AT&T Provided Cell Towers for McCain Ranch
- McCain's Media Spending Rose Sharply in June
- NY Times' McCain Story Draws Public Interest -- And Disapproval
- Obama, McCain spent $28 million on television advertising last week
- And here They Come Around the Final Turn...
- Old Friends in the Media See a New Side of McCain
- Recent Obama Ads More Negative Than Rival's, Study Says
- When all truth is relative
- McCain's Denials Begin to Unravel
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

