Originally published: September 23, 2008
Last updated: September 22, 2008 - 9:09pm
[Commentary] In these past 18 months, we've heard endless punditry on politicians' personalities from people who seem to be even more divorced from the voting public than the politicians they cover. The marketing of the candidates, which used to be the domain of Advertising Age and company, has sometimes threatened to become the whole story. One badly made ad with no media budget is now talked up and analyzed as if it's headline news. Not once have I picked up a newspaper or turned on a broadcast to find a lengthy discussion of how America is going to educate and retrain its citizens to make them competitive in a digitized, globalized economy. Not once have I seen a thorough analysis of what exactly is going to replace the country's rapidly disappearing manufacturing sector. No one outside a handful of people in the business media had -- until last Monday -- given serious time to how we should handle the dissolution of the investment banks, one of the nation's leading wealth-creating institutions. Seems like important stuff, but it's been upstaged by a futile discussion of who said what about lipstick.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Political coverage is more noise than news
- Alms for the Press?
- 7 Social Networks Obama And The GOP Hopefuls Should Definitely Join
- Blogger's Silicon Valley clout gets politicians talking
- Blago-gate Dominates the Week's News
- The top ten media blunders of 2008
- Missing: Politicians who take a clear stand on tech
- The Boys on Le Bus: Foreign Press Mines Local Angles in US Primary
- The media's obsession -- make it stop!
- Obama and McCain coverage: "Nuts" or a "disgrace"?
- Economy, Debate Drive News Narrative
- Big Storms: The Month that Was September
- 4 ways technology will impact politics in 2012
- How Google Instant Is Influencing Elections
- GOP losing the new-media war
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

