Last updated: October 1, 2008 - 8:22am
A 2003 election reform law requires candidates to acknowledge in their own voices their responsibility for advertisements they run on public airwaves. But five years later, the "I approved" has become a pivotal device in commercials for Congress and the White House, a place for candidates to make a declaration of intent, summarize the message or take a parting shot. The intent of the law was twofold: to inform the public of who paid for the advertisement and to discourage candidates from slinging so much mud at one another. The first part has worked, said a Vanderbilt University political science professor, John Geer, but the level of political vitriol has not changed. "This reform was completely counterproductive," Geer said. "Everybody complains about the sound bite as it is and here we took the ad and made it shorter. And it didn't work. The 2004 campaign was more negative than 2000 by far."What's more, the phrase is now a political cliché, as evidenced recently when "Saturday Night Live" spoofed it by having a Senator McCain doppelganger approving increasingly ridiculous attacks on Senator Obama.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Campaign groups spar over ad rules
- Obama's ad campaign extends to more states
- NH Is Already Flooded With Attack Ads
- Campaign Finance Reform: Experiences of Two States That Offered Full Public Funding for Political Candidates
- Obama Is Catching Up to McCain In Television-Ad Spending
- Take Back the Airwaves
- New Media Could Force Creative Races
- Campaign Videos: A Time-Tested Election Tactic
- Election 2012 Dollars Stream In
- The Internet has become too big to fail, says In-Q-Tel's Dan Geer
- Candidates, Parties Shave Corners in Ads
- Candidates, Retailers Vie for TV Time
- Campaigns Pressure Stations Over '527' Ads
- Lawmakers Seek Inventory of U.S. Airwaves
- Obama campaign arm focuses on talk radio
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

