Last updated: October 27, 2008 - 9:06pm
[Commentary] What's odd is that while this election is historic precisely because of the major-party candidacy of a man who, under U.S. standards of race, is black, race goes unaddressed. Instead, race is both everywhere and nowhere, overriding and unacknowledged, a presence rather than a set of concrete issues. It stalks the conference room, uninvited, and never gets to sit at the table with the subjects that matter. The media's failure to force either candidate to talk about race-related policies creates an enormous potential for Obama, no less than McCain, to ignore or soft-pedal a basketful of historically explosive issues. Three years ago, after Hurricane Katrina reacquainted white Americans with the persistence of black poverty, brave words were spoken and bold pledges made. How ironic it would be if now this racially historic campaign ushered in a new era of racial neglect. (Edward Wasserman is Knight professor of journalism ethics at Washington and Lee University.)
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Let's Talk About Race—or Maybe Not
- Race, Gender, and the Media in the 2008 Elections
- For 1st time, Democrats' debate airs on Hispanic TV
- Black Radio on Obama Is Left's Answer to Limbaugh
- Internet Companies Concentrating Power
- Political Ad's Message To Latinos: 'Don't Vote'
- McCain Wins the Coverage Battle as Media Move to Anoint Him
- All the propaganda that's fit to print
- Hillary Clinton Hits 'Sexism' In Media Coverage -- Says Gender Bigger Drawback Than Race
- A Historic Event for Women, Still Largely Covered by Men
- TV Casting May Feel an Obama Effect
- Journalism becoming a consumer product
- In Tight Race, Ad on Black Candidate Stirs Furor
- Dean derides 'sexist' media coverage
- Could Celebrity status hurt Obama?
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

