Originally published: November 4, 2008
Last updated: November 5, 2008 - 12:54pm
The Supreme Court justices talked about indecency and foul language Tuesday, but they did so without using any of the actual words that federal regulators hope to ban from television and radio broadcasts. At issue before the court today was a crackdown on broadcast expletives announced by the FCC four years ago. Broadcasters can face fines of more than $325,000 for airing an expletive, but they won a lower-court ruling that blocked the policy from being enforced. Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia made clear that they strongly support the drive to keep the F-word and the S-word off broadcasts during the hours when children and families are likely to be watching. But they may not speak for the majority. Justice John Paul Stevens commented that the F-word, in some formulations, can be "very funny." He also wondered whether the government could ban other words that refer to sex or excrement.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Can you say that on TV? The Supreme Court debates
- Court term to hear tobacco, TV dirty words cases
- Supreme Court Asked to Restore Indecency Regulations
- Top Court weighs broadcast indecency
- Supreme Court Upholds 'Fleeting Expletive' Rule for Now
- Supreme Court considers FCC's rein on foul words
- Indecency Court Challenges Begin
- Supreme Court defers action on TV 'expletives' case
- Justice Department Asks Supreme Court to Review FCC Profanity Decision
- High Court Tees Up F-Word Case
- FCC to Challenge Profanity Decision in Supreme Court
- Habitat for Profanity: Broadcast TV's Sharp Increase in Foul Language
- Supreme Court Schedules June 23 Conference on TV Profanity Case
- PTC Study Charts Increase in TV Profanity
- Court Declines to Release Fox Profanity Tapes
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

