Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 1:31am
PHONE, CABLE TRADE FIRE OVER ADS
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Arshad Mohammed]
AT&T yesterday accused cable television companies of suppressing public debate by refusing to air ads that urge lawmakers to make it easier for phone companies to get into the TV business. Time Warner Cable shot back that it was under no obligation to carry its competitors' ads while Comcast Corp. said it rejected the spots because they were riddled with false and misleading claims. The charges are the latest in a long series of broadsides between phone companies, which want to offer TV without having to get thousands of franchise agreements at localities all over the country, and cable companies, which believe their rivals should have to secure local agreements just as they did. Both sides have launched media campaigns to sway lawmakers debating whether to grant phone companies state or national franchises. The Federal Communications Commission is also studying whether local authorities are "unreasonably" denying franchises.
See also --
* Profile: Stealing a March on Cable TV's Turf
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Doug Halonen]
A look at AT&T lobbyist Tim McKone.
(requires free registration)
- Verizon Executive Calls for End to Google's 'Free Lunch'
- House Republicans offer Bill to aid Telcos' Video
- AT&T Going after Comcast's Cable Market
- SBC Head Ignites Access Debate
- Cable Claims Plenty of Competition
- Internet Phone Subscriptions Up by a Third in 3 Months
- Cable Operators May Offer Family-Friendly Package
- Sprint Nextel Agrees to Buy Texas Affiliate
- McDowell Shows Independence
- Verizon Lays It on the Line
- FCC Probes Selling of Cell Phone Records
- Let Phone and Cable firms Compete for TV Viewers
- Stevens Introduces Comprehensive Telecom Reform Bill
- Community TV: If cable changes, what would happen to public programming?
- Franchise Players