Last updated: December 3, 2008 - 9:45am
A federal judge who earlier rejected Bush administration claims that it was exempt from laws governing domestic surveillance was asked Tuesday to strike down an act of Congress that grants retroactive immunity for illegal wiretapping. Congress enacted the FISA Amendments Act to shield the telecom companies from the lawsuits. But in a class action against AT&T, the Electronic Frontier Foundation asked US District Judge Vaughn Walker to rule the FISA Amendments Act unconstitutional, saying that it violated individual privacy rights and granted excessive latitude for the attorney general to decide the legal responsibility of carriers that gave data to the NSA. Justice Department lawyers reminded Judge Walker that the congressional action was intended to shield the telecom carriers from liability for complying with government orders, and urged the judge to dismiss both challenges. The ACLU action alleging that President Bush overstepped his powers was dismissed by the Supreme Court in February, when the justices said that the rights group had failed to prove actual privacy violations.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Bond: White House seems flexible on immunity for telecoms over wiretaps
- Senate to Debate Telecom Firms' Immunity in Surveillance Role
- The Wiretap Deal
- House defeats stopgap extension of spy program
- Senators seek end to telecom's immunity for spying program
- Wiretapping battle heats up on Capitol Hill
- Telecom Immunity Law Challenged In Court
- Dodd Wins Fight to Block Passage of Surveillance Legislation
- FBI chief: Lack of legal shield won't halt telecom spy partnerships
- Wiretap suits press on in the wake of FISA amendments
- Congress Passes Extension of Surveillance Law
- Those DEMs and the FISA Update
- Bush Wins on Spy Bill
- Legislation Seeks to Ease Rules on Domestic Spying
- Details on Surveillance Released
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

