Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 1:45am
DON'T UNDERCUT INTERNET ACCESS
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle 4/17, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] The wide and unbounded Internet could soon be fenced in by cable and phone firms. Higher prices and less choice may lie ahead under a misguided bill moving forward in Congress. A House committee dumped a plan to enforce network neutrality, a clunky term for an important concept. The phrase stands for an original ideal of Internet -- equal access and no hidden charges to climb aboard. down at the consumer level, the impact could be different. Customers could face one set of services offered by a cable or phone company -- or a higher-priced list of alternatives from outsiders. If Yahoo was part of the standard-priced bundle, would you pay more for Google? It would be a two-tier world, not the even-up access that the Internet offers now. New upstarts would have a hard time cracking the lineup, while the familiar names stayed on top. The Internet isn't served by layers of government regulation. But it shouldn't become a captive of one industry. Net neutrality should be a guiding principle to guarantee open use.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/04/17/EDGNSGUA4F1.DTL
Related
- Electronics group restates case for Net Neutrality
- High-tech Firms want to Maintain Network Neutrality
- An Internet Test
- Today's Quote
- The Corporate Toll on the Internet
- Why Network Operators are Flexing their Muscles
- Faltering Telecom Bill May Spur FCC Action On Video Services
- The Price of Net Neutrality
- Phonezilla!
- Tangled Net
- FCC and Congress Need to Slap Down Comcast and Adopt Open Internet Access Rules
- CDT Paper Calls For Narrowly Tailored Internet Neutrality Legislation
- Snowe, Senate Democrats Offer Net Neutrality Bill
- Broadband giants say Net neutrality fears misguided
- Boucher: Net Neutrality stalls Broadband Measure
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

