Originally published: February 6, 2009
Last updated: February 6, 2009 - 4:35pm
[Commentary] To anyone in Congress trying to cut funding for rural broadband, ask yourself this: do you care about the future economic viability of the rural communities you represent? If so, how can you justify taking away money from the only infrastructure that gives these rural communities a fighting chance to not just survive but thrive in the 21st century? It's like saying, "Rural America doesn't deserve to be a player on the world's stage, their businesses don't need any help competing in the global economy, their children are just fine being disconnected and unable to access the resources of their peers, their elderly and sick can get by without top-flight medical care" and so on. I can't help but feel that anyone trying to cut funding from rural broadband is basically saying, "Well, this looks like it's going to be hard, and there's no guarantee it's going to succeed, so let's hedge our bets and back off from pushing all in."
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- A Comprehensive, Pragmatic Rural Broadband Stimulus Package
- North Carolina Seeks $28 Million in Broadband Stimulus
- Fiber-to-the-Home Project Wins USDA Broadband Stimulus Award
- Nation's utility consumer advocates make stimulus spending recommendations
- From Broadband Market to Broadband Ecology
- Klobuchar Calls for Broadband Investments as Part of Economic Recovery Plan
- Recovery Act: The Stimulus Index
- Broadband Stimulus Oversight Hearing
- Advancing Broadband: A Foundation for Strong Rural Communities
- Strong Demand for Broadband Stimulus Funds
- Will You Feel the Benefit of the Stimulus Package? Find Out Here
- Why the Stimulus Bill Discounts Broadband
- The Advantages of a Rural Fiber Fund
- Telecoms Say Web Funding For Unserved Falls Short
- Broadband, Health IT, and Smart Electrical Grid Remain Part of Stimulus Package
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

