Last updated: February 23, 2009 - 9:22am
If it is ultimately upheld, a memorandum opinion written by a federal judge in Virginia and released last week may limit the overclassification of information on national security grounds and prevent future prosecutions for leaking such information. The opinion could also spell the end to a four-year effort by the Justice Department to convict two former pro-Israeli lobbyists for allegedly violating the Espionage Act by passing classified government information to journalists and an Israeli Embassy official. U.S. District Judge Thomas S. Ellis III wrote the Feb. 17 opinion in a case, brought originally in 2005, that involves Stephen J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, both of whom at the time were working for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Their jobs were to lobby U.S. executive and legislative branch officials who had policymaking responsibilities in areas of AIPAC's interest.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Cabinet Officials Cite Concerns About Senate Version of Reporter's Shield Law
- Spying on The Associated Press
- Press Can Be Prosecuted for Having Secret Files, U.S. Says
- Administration Took Accidental Path to Setting Record for Leak Cases
- After Afghan War Leaks, Revisions in a Shield Bill
- Twitter is subpoenaed in Wikileaks affair
- Attorney General Holder Assigns Prosecutors To Leaks Probe
- Attorney General Threatens to Go After Reporters
- US court narrows reach of computer fraud law
- US Weighs Prosecution of WikiLeaks Founder, but Legal Scholars Warn of Steep Hurdles
- FBI Probes Leaks on Iran Cyberattack
- Keeping Secrets: In Presidential Memo, A New Designation for Classifying Information
- Freedom of the Press and Criminal Solicitation
- Official Secrets
- 90 Day Review of Classifying Government Information
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

