Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 2:03am
CONNECTICUT MAY NOT REQUIRE IPTV FRANCHISES
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]
Internet-protocol television is "merely another form of data stream" and not subject to cable-franchising requirements, according to a tentative decision by the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control. If the decision receives final approval June 7, the regulator's action would allow the rollout of IPTV by AT&T's state division, Southern New England Telephone Co., without oversight by the commission.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6332673.html?display=Breaking+News
NO VOTE ON FLORIDA STATEWIDE-FRANCHISE BILL
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]
The state Senate in Florida ended its session for the year Friday without ever calling for a vote on the bill that would have enabled statewide franchising for telephone competitors. The bill, HB1199, was resoundingly approved by the state House, but supporters could not muster enough support for even a vote in the Senate.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6332671.html?display=Breaking+News
Related
- Iowa Lawsuits Target Franchise Fees
- Qwest Backs State Franchise Bill
- Federal Judge Stands By Connecticut IPTV Ruling
- Fla. Statewide-Franchise Bill Heads to Gov
- Franchise Bills Dominate State Debates
- Texas-Sized Fight Over Law
- Verizon Gets Statewide Franchise in California
- AT&T Wins Statewide Ohio Video Franchise
- Connecticut Legislators Approve Franchise-Reform Bill
- PA Statewide-Franchise Bills Move Forward
- Verizon Still in Local Calif. Franchise Talks
- Illinois Gov. Signs Franchise Law
- Milwaukee Sues AT&T Over U-verse
- Cox Gains Statewide Nod in California
- CT Attorney General: Make AT&T Get Cable License
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

