Submitted: March 4, 2009 - 9:25pm
Originally published: March 4, 2009
Last updated: March 4, 2009 - 9:40pm
Originally published: March 4, 2009
Last updated: March 4, 2009 - 9:40pm
Source:
Wall Street Journal
Author:
Amol Sharma
Critics have attacked municipal Internet projects, calling them taxpayer-sapping money-losers and ventures better served by the private sector. But if President Barack Obama is serious about wiring rural America with high-speed Web access, these efforts will play a key role. The reason: Commercial operators don't want to lay cable and erect cell towers in the hinterland. Telecom and cable providers say they'll eventually reach the rural areas where 10 million Americans are stranded with dial-up access. But for communities wanting to ring in the 21st century sooner rather than later, municipal projects might be their best hope.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Wi-Fi run by Cities: Yea or nay?
- Dear RUS/NTIA: There Will Be Losers And That's OK
- Telecoms Say Web Funding For Unserved Falls Short
- The Advantages of a Rural Fiber Fund
- Wireless -- With Strings Attached
- No State Can Afford To Outlaw Municipal Broadband
- The Best Billion We Can Spend On Rural Broadband
- Sprint Offers to Buy Rest of Clearwire
- Qwest Seeks To Sell Piece Of Its Network
- Boston Globe union offers to talk cost cuts
- Stimulus could revitalize muni Wi-Fi, other stalled projects
- Broadband stimulus details separating likely winners, losers
- Companies That Fought Cities On Wi-Fi Now Rush to Join In
- Broadband connectivity is a big issue in rural and remote parts of Minnesota
- European Broadband expansion boost
Ratings
Recommendation:
2
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

