Submitted: April 22, 2009 - 10:25pm
Originally published: April 22, 2009
Last updated: April 22, 2009 - 10:25pm
Originally published: April 22, 2009
Last updated: April 22, 2009 - 10:25pm
Source:
Editor&Publisher
Author:
Joe Strupp
One year after his blockbuster investigation into the links between retired military commentators and the Pentagon -- which won a Pulitzer Prize on Monday -- New York Times scribe David Barstow says the reporting has made a difference even if the television networks targeted in his coverage have not come clean. Barstow, the 10-year Times reporter who won his second Pulitzer one year to the day that his first report ran, notes the reporting sparked fierce debate on the Internet and in newspapers. He also sees signs of some network changes, at least behind the scenes. His Pulitzer win earned little notice on TV this week, compared to others.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Gen. McCaffrey privately briefs NBC execs on war with Iran
- Behind Military Analysts, the Pentagon’s Hidden Hand
- The Generals' Second Careers
- Inspector General Sees No Misdeeds in Pentagon's Effort to Make Use of TV Analysts
- Washington Post Wins 4 Pulitzers for Iraq War, Critic
- DOD Rescinds Report That Found No Evidence Of Pundit Propaganda
- 2011 Pulitzer Prize Winners Announced
- NY Times dominates 2009 Pulitzer Prize contest
- One Man's Military-Industrial-Media Complex
- Networks Still Hosting Military Analysts Without Identifying Massive Conflicts Of Interest
- 2012 Journalism Pulitzer Winners
- Pulitzer winners donate their prize to their peers
- For Pentagon and News Media, Relations Improve With a Shift in War Coverage
- Debate Slows New US Cyber Rules
- Files prove Pentagon is profiling reporters
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

