Last updated: May 21, 2009 - 8:40am
Opponents of the death penalty looking to exonerate wrongly accused prisoners say their efforts have been hobbled by the dwindling size of America's newsrooms, and particularly the disappearance of investigative reporting at many regional papers. In the past, lawyers opposed to the death penalty often provided the broad outlines of cases to reporters, who then pursued witnesses and unearthed evidence. Now, the lawyers complain, they have to do more of the work themselves and that means it often doesn't get done. They say many fewer cases are being pursued by journalists, after a spate of exonerations several years ago based on the work of reporters. The decline in newsroom resources has also hampered efforts by death-penalty opponents to search for irrefutable DNA evidence that an innocent person has been executed in America.
- Judge Rules That RIAA Had Right To Sue Woman Wrongfully Accused Of File-Sharing
- Libraries dying for bandwidth—where's the fiber (and cash)?
- Yes, journalists deserve subsidies too
- Percentage Of Minority Journalists Moves Up Less Than 0.5%
- Despite Budgets, Some Newsrooms Persist in Costly Fight for Records
- Concrete Steps Congress Can Take to Protect America's Intellectual Property
- Is the death of newspapers the end of good citizenship?
- Aaron Swartz and How a Martyr Makes a Law
- CPB Announces Funding to Expand American Public Media’s Public Insight Network
- Newspapers turn into rich men's toys
- FCC Will Investigate CBS's Attempt To Consolidate Newsrooms
- Prison Plans to Shackle Cellphones
- Libya Threatens Death Penalty for People Caught Using Satellite Phones
- The rebirth of news
- Today's Quote 01.22.08