OH Consumer Advocate calls for Residential Customer Benefits in Verizon-MCI Merger
Last updated: February 20, 2008 - 10:21pm
Two large telephone companies with many Ohio customers propose to merge without demonstrating any benefits for residential consumers as required by state law, the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) said last week. The OCC, along with other consumer groups, filed a brief at the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) and recommend that the proposed Verizon-MCI merger be rejected unless customer benefits are included as conditions. The conditions cover pricing, consumer protections, access to broadband, community voicemail systems, and competitive local telephone service. Prior to merging, Verizon and MCI are required to gain approval from regulators in several states and at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Regulators in many states, including Ohio, and at the FCC have the power to impose conditions in order to grant merger approval.
[SOURCE: Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel press release]
Links to Sources
Related
- Additional Telecom Merger Coverage/Reaction
- Dept of Justice Approves Two Big Telecom Mergers
- Consumer advocates urge FCC to investigate wireless Lifeline benefits
- Free Voice Mail in Ohio
- Antitrust Group Urges ‘Meaningful’ Conditions on Bell Mergers
- Hold the Line
- Two Telecom Mergers, One Digital Divide
- FCC Plan Could Raise Residential Phone Fees
- FCC nominee's job could lead to recusal on telecom merger
- Washington State regulators approve Verizon sale to Frontier Communications with numerous conditions
- XM-Sirius Merger Constitutes a Monopoly
- AT&T, BellSouth Merger Passes Antitrust Test
- Consumers Paying Billions due to Misallocated Telecom Costs
- FCC Delays Vote on Telecom Mergers
- FCC Approves AT&T-BellSouth Deal
Topics
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

