Last updated: June 8, 2009 - 8:20am
Rural folks aren't prone to complain. They work hard, love their communities and wouldn't think of living anywhere else. But that doesn't mean they don't want, and need, to be connected to the outside world. "Just because we live in rural America doesn't mean we shouldn't have broadband," says Jeff Roper, a third-generation peanut farmer. "We're all Americans. We shouldn't be treated less than anyone else." By pushing hard on broadband, lawmakers hope to close the "digital divide" that has long separated rural America. In doing so, they hope to give rural consumers access to the same sorts of high-speed services and opportunities — think telemedicine, distance-learning and Web-based commerce — that city dwellers have enjoyed for years.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Does Broadband Need a Stimulus?
- If Wall St. Doesn't Want Carriers To Go Rural, Why Should We?
- We Can't Afford To Short Change Rural America
- Qwest passes on broadband stimulus funds
- We Should Only Subsidize Wireless And Next-Gen Wireline Broadband
- Federal stimulus could expand Missouri rural broadband
- Let's keep our eye on the broadband prize
- Misconceptions About Rural Broadband
- House Agriculture Committee Skeptical on RUS' Ability to Manage Funds
- Officials hope map detailing high-speed Internet access will help bring service to rural Texas
- Connected Nation Takes Aim At Stimulus Broadband Mapping; Rural Areas Could Be Hurt
- Understanding What The Broadband Stimulus Does, and What It Doesn't Try To do
- New Broadband Stimulus Requirements Include Urban Cities
- Universal Service minimums: 4 Mb/s vs. 100 Mb/s
- County Stuck In Information Superhighway Slow Lane
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

