Last updated: June 25, 2009 - 8:14am
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a must-carry challenge and gave a shout-out to the rule as meant to help TV stations do more than just survive. The court this week rejected Cablevision's challenge to an FCC order requiring carriage of WRNN New York in some Long Island communities under the market-modification provisions of must-carry. In the process, it took an expansive view of the benefits of the must-carry rule, citing the Supreme Court's Turner decision and concluding that it did not mean to limit must-carry to the minimum of replicating a DMA. The FCC had added the communities to WRNN's market for must-carry purposes. Cablevision balked, saying the station was shopping for beachfront property, and took the decision to court. Oral argument was held in April 2008 in what was just the latest in an ongoing tug-of-war between the station and Cablevision over carriage.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Cablevision to Petition Supreme Court on Must-Carry
- Supreme Court Upholds Cable TV 'Must-Carry' Rule
- Must Carry Proves To Have Staying Power
- FCC Grants Must-Carry to WRNN-DT
- Cable Nets Lose Dual Carriage Case
- C-SPAN Asks Supreme Court to Overturn Must-Carry Rules
- C-SPAN Backs Dish Challenge to Government Carriage Mandates
- ACA Sees Hopeful Signs On Retransmission Remake
- Court Hears Dual Must Carry Case
- Fox, Cablevision Feud Continues, Baseball Fans Make Plans
- Cablevision Asks Supreme Court To Review Constitutionality Of Must-Carry
- DTV Transition Update -- Americans Unaware Of Digital TV Switch
- Fox Declines to Point Finger at Cablevision
- Multicast Must-Carry Vote 6/15
- Supreme Court Conferences on Must-Carry Challenge
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

