Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 2:45am
THE NEW FCC
[SOURCE: Washington Times 6/15, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] Two weeks ago, the Federal Communications Commission finally secured a Republican majority, something it has not had for almost a year and half. During that time, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has had no choice but to work with the two Democrats on the commission and has generally done quite well minimizing the potential for the usual regulatory, big-government intervention in an incredibly dynamic telecommunications marketplace. Thus, one would think that there is cause for relief now that two new Republican commissioners have joined the FCC and that this agency would not begin regulating for no good reason. But, surprisingly, the first issue teed up for decision is something called "multicast must carry," a big government mandate pressed by broadcasters for years. In essence, this mandate would force cable and satellite providers to carry all the programming streams dreamed up by broadcasters, instead of allowing the marketplace and consumers to drive the demand for what they want to watch. The FCC has twice previously rejected multicasting requirements for two reasons. One, it's a bad idea. Two, it's unconstitutional. Unfortunately, FCC Chairman Martin has always supported this mandate. So, the test of whether President Bush will finally get a free-market-oriented commission that understands that government intervention is a last, and usually bad, resort rests with the two new commissioners, Robert McDowell and Deborah Tate. We hope they understand how important the stakes really are.
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060614-091336-1651r.htm
Links to Sources
Related
- NCTA Claims Progress in Multicast Must-Carry Fight
- Cable Nets Unite To Fight Multicast Carriage
- Verizon To Carry PBS Multicast Channels
- At Convention, Bell Firms Hear Accolades -- And Barbs
- NAB: FCC Should Make Must-Carry Call
- Barton, Upton Hear It From Religious Broadcasters
- Media reformers to Martin: DTV is about quality, not quantity
- AT&T Concerned About Multicasting Mandates
- Religion-based shows fear yet more remoteness in TV wilderness
- Coalitions Take Competing Stances Over 'Multicasting' Rules
- Upton: House Won't Take Up Second Digital TV Bill
- Ideologically Diverse Groups Question 'Multicasting'
- FCC puts off Vote on TV Multicasting on Cable
- AT&T backs TV multicasts, ahead of likely FCC move
- Children's Programming Could Fuel Free-Speech Case Over Digital TV
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

