Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 2:47am
FACTORS THAT MAY INCREASE FUTURE SPENDING FROM THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND
[SOURCE: Congressional Budget Office, AUTHOR: Philip Webre]
To encourage greater access to telephone and other telecommunications services, the Universal Service Fund (USF) provides financial support to some producers and consumers of those services. Spending for USF programs rose by 50 percent between fiscal years 2000 and 2005. Much of that increase went to support companies that offer telephone service in rural locations and other areas where the cost of providing such service is higher than the national average. This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) paper -- prepared at the request of the Senate Budget Committee -- examines recent trends in spending by the USF’s High-Cost Program, which subsidizes telecommunications providers in high-cost areas. The paper examines factors that may increase such spending in the future and discusses options to restrict the growth of outlays. In keeping with CBO’s mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this report makes no recommendations.
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=7291&type=1
Links to Sources
Related
- How Do the Feds Fund Broadband?
- FCC Seeks Comment on Recommendation to Cap High-Cost Fund
- Universal Service Reform, Universal Broadband Comments Due April 3
- House Telecom Bill to Exceed Unfunded Mandates Threshold
- Universal Service Deadline Changed
- California Gov Schwarzenegger signs bills preserving rural phone service
- Keep Universal Service Fund close to current size
- House Dems urge FCC to cap USF high-cost fund
- How to Create a More Efficient Broadband Universal Service Program by Incorporating Demand and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- Connect America Fund I (NPRM)
- Hearing: Universal Service
- The Universal Service Fund: What Do High-Cost Subsides Subsidize?
- Flawed USF white paper based on faulty assumptions about fund mechanics
- Senators argue against reverse auctions for universal service
- Improve Universal Service Fund performance and accountability
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

