Last updated: September 4, 2009 - 8:53am
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a challenge by the Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Association, which had argued that the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act is unconstitutionally vague and infringes on people's right to privacy. The 2006 law prohibits banks and credit card companies from processing payments used for unlawful online gambling. The gaming group argued that the law is too vague because there's no generally accepted definition of unlawful Internet gambling. Instead, the statute leaves it to state and federal governments to define illegal Web gambling. But the court rejected that argument. "The fact that gambling may be prohibited in some states but permitted in others does not render the act unconstitutionally vague," the court wrote.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Online Gambling Law Challenged
- Third Circuit Denies Full-Court Review Of Fox Decision
- Fox v. FCC: FCC Concentrates And Asks Again
- Authors Guild Presses Class-Action Case Against Google
- Appeals Court Strikes Down FCC Indecency Policy
- EFF to court: Don't shield telecoms from illegal-spying suits
- Second Circuit Seeks More Input on Fleeting Nudity
- Judge: Law Prohibiting Text Message Spam Not Unconstitutional
- Sinclair's Media Ownership Challenge Stays in Ninth Circuit
- Appeal Rejected, P2P User On Hook For $28K
- Ninth Circuit: Apple did not engage in copyright misuse by restricting OS X to Apple hardware
- Legal Issues Murky When Government, Marketers Mine Data From Social Sites
- FCC: Fox Decision Suggests Indecency Regime Is Unconstitutional
- Court affirms Child Online Protection Act unconstitutional
- Injunction Issued Against Utah Internet Censorship Law
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

