Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 2:51am
SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW ANTITRUST CASE AGAINST PHONE COMPANIES
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Stephen Labaton]
The Supreme Court announced Monday that it would consider a lawsuit that accuses the nation's largest telephone companies of violating federal antitrust law by conspiring to carve up local markets to preserve their monopolies. AT&T, Verizon and Qwest asked the court to rule after they failed to persuade an appeals court that the large consumer action should be dismissed for lack of evidence. The complaint by the consumers did not offer direct evidence of a conspiracy. Instead, it relied on the fact that the companies had engaged in "parallel conduct" of not moving into each other's service areas. The phone companies said the standard set by the appeals court was so low that it would inevitably encourage baseless lawsuits. The case has gained attention because it could set the standard for motions to dismiss antitrust claims filed under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. A collection of influential business interests, some of whom have been defendants in antitrust cases, has filed briefs supporting the phone companies. They include the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the National Association of Manufacturers and companies in the airline, commodities, credit card and chemical industries. The appeals court told the telephone companies that there would be ample opportunity for them to make the case at trial that there was not enough evidence to prove a conspiracy. The telephone appeal, Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, No. 05-1126, will be heard in the Supreme Court's next term, which begins in October.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/27/business/27bizcourt.html
(requires registration)
Links to Sources
Related
- Baby Bell Lawsuit Is Allowed to Proceed
- Supreme Court Hears Views In Telecom Competition Case
- Supreme Court Rules for Baby Bells
- Supreme Court: online music price-fixing lawsuit can proceed
- Supreme Court Case on Baby Bells May Affect Antitrust Enforcement
- Court Rules Evidence Against Telecoms Insufficient To Show Collusion
- Three Book Publishers Settle with Dept of Justice; Apple, Two Other Publishers Face Suit
- AT&T wins conspiracy verdict over long-distance surcharges
- The DOJ’s half-baked explanation of Apple’s role in the e-book case
- Fine, 1 Year Sentence for E-Rate Fraud
- Judge stays e-book class action case against two publishers
- Two Men Plead Guilty To Defrauding FCC Program
- Executive Guilty of Defrauding the E-rate Program
- Judge Looks Into Modifying Terms of 2 Phone Mergers
- Rebekah Brooks charged with perverting the course of justice
Topics
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

