Last updated: February 20, 2008 - 10:23pm
The FCC is still considering a host of indecency actions. Sources say they are likely to be released as a package deal and handled at the commissioner level rather than issued by the Enforcement Bureau. Enforcement Bureau notices of apparent liability, or complaint denials, do not have to be voted on by the commissioners. Apparently FCC Chairman Kevin Martin wants to release the actions all at once and with the commissioners weighing in so that there could be more clarity to FCC indecency enforcement going forward. FCC indecency fines provide broadcasters with guidance on what they can program. But without a clear statutory definition, that guidance is the sum of past FCC decisions to fine or not to. One line of reasoning goes that since those decisions effectively constrain content for the nation's most powerful communications medium, arguably even more so when companies are settling complaints with promises of self-regulation, the commissioners should have to vote on them.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
* New FCC Chairman Preps His Indecent Proposal
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117930043?categoryid=1622&cs=1&s=h&p=0
Related
- FCC Majority Backs Packaging Indecency Complaints at Commission Level
- Indecency Enforcement Actions Confirmed
- 'Las Vegas' Blasted at FCC
- Regulation of Obscenity, Indecency and Profanity
- FCC finds itself in another fine mess
- FCC upholds CBS fine for Jackson Breast Flash
- Why Indecency, Once Hot at FCC, Cooled
- Get Set for Plenty of DC Action in 2007
- McDowell: FCC Quietly Dismissing Indecency Complaints
- FCC to Fine Telecoms
- Martin Defends Comcast Place at Head of VNR Fine Line
- Another DTV Opportunity Missed by the FCC
- FCC to Ease License Snarl: Martin to Extend Stations' Indecency Liability
- Katrina, Indecency Put Payola On Hold At FCC
- Fox to FCC: 'American Dad' Inquiry is Unconstitutional
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

