Last updated: October 6, 2009 - 9:05pm
[Commentary] What does the Network Neutrality debate mean to Smalltown, USA, and rural America? At its core, the net neutrality debate pits those who believe the Internet is a channel for open communications against those whose best financial interests lie in a controlled Internet. Net neutrality just ensures that if Joe's Local Hardware Emporium and Smallville Data Storage Co. both want to move 500 gigabits of data through a provider's network to the Internet, the provider can't show favoritism moving either company's data. If Smallville is moving 500 gigabits and Rural Telemed is moving 100 gigs, it's ok if Smallville pays more, but under net neutrality the operator cannot arbitrarily slow down RT's data traffic because they're the smaller customer. So don't let the incumbent PR blitz fool you. Net neutrality, applied fairly to big and small Internet service providers is good for consumers, businesses and providers.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- All Internet is equal -- except when it's not
- AT&T Slams Google Voice; Could Open Can of Worms
- Network Neutrality back in spotlight for debate
- Speak Your Piece: Internet Ghosts
- We can't be neutral on network neutrality
- 95 Democratic Candidates Adopt Network Neutrality Pledge
- Network Neutrality: A complex topic made simple
- Understanding Network Neutrality -- Worst Case Scenario
- Don't let Network Neutrality foes stifle innovation
- Blue Dog Dems Hedge Bets on Net Neutrality
- A Disconnect Between Congress and the FCC on Network Neutrality
- Net Neutrality: A Historical Timeline
- Companies lobby newest FCC members on network neutrality rule
- Free State Foundation Legal Thinkers Criticize Network Neutrality
- GOP Senators Criticize FCC's Net Neutrality Guidelines
Legislation
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

