Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 3:08am
EXPERTS DIFFER ABOUT SURVEILLANCE AND PRIVACY
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Scott Shane]
Legal experts squared off before Congress on Wednesday about the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance program, offering radically different views on whether changes in the law are needed to allow eavesdropping on terror suspects without violating Americans’ privacy. Wednesday’s hearing was the latest sign that Congress was reasserting its role in overseeing sensitive counterterrorist surveillance programs, despite President Bush’s argument that he has the inherent constitutional authority to order eavesdropping without court approval. The discussion on Wednesday underscored the uncertainty, even among experts, about the security agency’s practices at a time when the Internet is reshaping communications.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/20/washington/20intel.html
(requires registration)
* Spy law changes divide House panel
http://news.com.com/Spy+law+changes+divide+House+panel/2100-1028_3-6096157.html?tag=nefd.top
Links to Sources
Related
- Deal Is Likely on Detainees but Not on Eavesdropping
- Democrats Set to Press Bush on Privacy and Terrorism
- Today's Quote 11.10.06
- Attention in N.S.A. Debate Turns to Telecom Industry
- White House to Release Details on Eavesdropping
- Administration Pulls Back on Surveillance Agreement
- Surveillance Bill Meets Resistance in Senate
- Secrecy Is at Issue in Suits Opposing Spy Program
- Phone Companies Seeking Immunity Donate to Rockefeller
- Google Street View privacy flap shows growing rift between US, EU
- Congress Takes Up Surveillance Bills
- Surveillance law won't do enough to protect privacy
- Wiretapping the Internet must be balanced with privacy concerns
- Key Senators Raise Doubts on Eavesdropping Immunity
- Comcast on Net Neutrality: Cool Off
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

